Inside Edition: “It’s been reported that Madoff said, ‘Screw the victims.’ What’s your response?”
Answer in chorus: “He already did.”
Read more by clicking on the title above.
Just when it looked like Ponzi schemes had run their course—for the time being—we learned of another. The Daily Beast reported:
Sorry, former President Clinton: It’s not that Ken Starr. A financial adviser with the same name as Clinton’s former nemesis was arrested on Thursday for allegedly perpetrating a $30 million fraud and Ponzi scheme. Clients to Ken Starr, the chairman and CEO of Starr & Company, include Annie Leibovitz, Uma Thurman, Martin Scorsese, Wesley Snipes, and Henry Kissinger. Authorities also arrested Andy Stein, the former Manhattan borough president and New York City Council president, for lying to officials conducting the probe.
Here’s what I don’t get. Why is it necessary to sue these groups? Stanford’s name is toxic. I would think Democrats and Republicans alike would run from any association with him and return funds—quietly, under the radar, without spending taxpayer money through a back-and-forth lawsuit.
Last week Acrimoney posted an article entitled, Part I: The Ponzi Wives Poll. We presented the following case. A woman left her husband ten years ago. She waited until 2007 to sue for divorce. As their battle played out in court, a second front emerged. In 2009 the SEC charged the husband with financial fraud.